New York Post89%
The surprising reason JPMorgan lawyers don’t want Chirayu Rana to drop his bombshell ‘sex slave’ lawsuit 75%
By Peter Senzamici0%
6/23/2026, 10:00:00 AM
BS Summary: This article contains 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 34% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 934 faulty-reasoning hits from 459 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66.8% and a BS Rank of 75% (5,555 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the article peer group.
Ex-JPMorgan banker Chirayu Rana wants to withdraw his explosive “sex slave” lawsuit against the bank and a female supervisor — but the bank is fighting to stop him from unceremoniously dropping his claims.
Defense lawyers also don't want Rana to be able to walk away from the Manhattan Supreme Court lawsuit and refile the claims in federal court.
In a pair of blistering legal salvos, attorneys for JPMorgan and bank bigwig Lorna Hajdini tore into Rana’s frantic attempt to pull the plug on his high-profile state lawsuit, accusing his new high-profile lawyers of “gross negligence” and “gamesmanship."
Rana’s “new counsel has entered this case with an approach similar to that of his prior counsel — promising the press new evidence to support Plaintiff’s claims while simultaneously seeking to delay this litigation and any accountability for Plaintiff’s lies,” lawyers for Hajdini wrote.
Rana and his legal team must answer for the claims in the lawsuit, which JPMorgan lawyers called “materially false,” according to documents filed last week.
JPMorgan and Hajdini have said from that jump that Rana’s allegations are entirely made up.
Both defendants argue that Rana should be forced to either stay in state court — or that the suit be dismissed for good, and that he pay legal fees.
Hajdini, who has filed a counterclaim alleging Rana defamed her, said her defamation allegation should be argued out before Rana is allowed to file in any new court.
Her attorneys claim they asked Rana’s team to provide a draft of their federal complaint twice, but they declined to do so.
In the lawsuit — which became an internet sensation after it was filed in April — Rana claimed he was drugged and made a sex slave by Hajdini, who also allegedly made racist claims about him and his wife.
The most infamous line from the suit was Rana's claim that Hajdini stripped off her top and said, “I bet your little Asian, fish head wife doesn’t have these cannons.”
Rana’s lawyers hit back on Monday, claiming opposing counsel is making demands to the court as if it were “a genie lamp that provides her heart’s desires regardless of whether they are tethered to fact, law, or reality.”
Attorney Jon Norinsberg claims Hajdini’s filing is rife with “hysterics and overwrought descriptions” and “continues to exploit publicly filed court documents to smear” his client.
Norinsberg dismisses claims of forum shopping and said Rana plans to comply with Thursday’s deadline of filing the suit under his real name — but in federal court.
“It is a familiar playbook used by defendants,” Norinsberg wrote, “attack the survivor, distract from the allegations, and portray themselves as the victim.”
Speakers
3speakers41%attributed speech271writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coverageLorna Hajdini
72 attributed words38% of attributed speech83% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.