Speaker summary
⁠61%1 analyzed article/video101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lorna Hajdini results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Begging the Question, and Unattributed Quote, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 50.6% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 366 faulty-reasoning hits from 101 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (16,306 of 28,364 speakers). This Lorna Hajdini is better (less manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Lorna Hajdini
Speaker details
Total words: 101
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

43% percentile
025507510042.5% percentile
26.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos101 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.6%50.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.3%25.3%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.2%17.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 25.3%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 0.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos