Topic summary
⁠11%1 analyzed article/video248 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sea Pines Traffic Circle results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 144 hits. Analysis detected 361 faulty-reasoning hits from 744 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,507 of 16,562 topics). This Sea Pines Traffic Circle is worse (more manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group.
Sea Pines Traffic Circle
Topic details
Total words: 744
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510078.8% percentile
5.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles744 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 4.7%4.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 3.1%3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 19.4%19.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos