Topic summary
56% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Schools results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 1,750 hits . Analysis detected 13,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,223 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (14,508 of 15,963 topics). This Schools is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. Schools
Topic details
Total words: 18,223
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles18.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst