Topic summary
32% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These School Safety results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 1,768 hits . Analysis detected 17,555 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,008 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,071 of 15,447 topics). This School Safety is better (less manipulative) than 91.10% of the peer group. School Safety
Topic details
Total words: 24,008
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.9% percentile 1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles24K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst