Topic summary
12% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,647 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Scholarships results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 1,427 hits . Analysis detected 14,047 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,649 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (15,423 of 16,494 topics). This Scholarships is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group. Scholarships
Topic details
Total words: 23,649
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.5% percentile 1.4% BS Score7 analyzed articles23.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst