Topic summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos8,436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samuel Alito results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 6,817 hits. Analysis detected 35,707 faulty-reasoning hits from 32,588 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (10,845 of 15,767 topics). This Samuel Alito is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group.
Samuel Alito
Topic ranking list

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.2% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles32.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 20.9%20.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 20.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos