Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 7,648 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Royals results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 3,488 hits . Analysis detected 24,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,452 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 22% (12,093 of 15,467 topics). This Royals is better (less manipulative) than 78.20% of the peer group. Royals
Topic details
Total words: 28,452
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.8% percentile 2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles28.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst