Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,351 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Greenhill results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 2,281 hits . Analysis detected 6,918 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,140 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 52% (2,995 of 6,135 authors). This Sam Greenhill is worse (more manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group. Sam Greenhill
Author details
Total words: 8,140
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.2% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 28.0% 28.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Author 28.0%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 8.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.5% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst