Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,222 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alanah Khosla results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 18.1% saturation with 885 hits. Analysis detected 4,347 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,888 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (2,561 of 6,192 authors). This Alanah Khosla is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Alanah Khosla
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠59%Alanah Khosla (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,888
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.2%8.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 18.1%18.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.9%13.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 18.1%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos