Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 684 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elizabeth Haigh results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 1,045 hits . Analysis detected 4,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.4% and a BS Rank of 89% (715 of 6,196 authors). This Elizabeth Haigh is worse (more manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Elizabeth Haigh
Author details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
89% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.5% percentile 6.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 38.2% 38.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 32.8% 32.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Author 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 38.2%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Author 32.8%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.2%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst