Topic summary
73%6 analyzed articles/videos2,860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Riots results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 3,896 hits. Analysis detected 29,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,497 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 51% (8,243 of 16,562 topics). This Riots is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Riots
Topic ranking list

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles20.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.2%18.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate