Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Daniel Boffey results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 1,185 hits . Analysis detected 8,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,672 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,561 authors). This Daniel Boffey is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Daniel Boffey
Author details
Total words: 8,672
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 13.7% 13.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 13.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst