Topic summary
⁠83%4 analyzed articles/videos2,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Remote Work results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 1,826 hits. Analysis detected 16,659 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,748 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,689 of 16,562 topics). This Remote Work is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Remote Work
Topic ranking list
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.5%15.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.9%4.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.7%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos