Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Rhitu Chatterjee results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 477 hits . Analysis detected 2,906 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,516 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,316 authors). This Rhitu Chatterjee is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Rhitu Chatterjee
Author details
Total words: 3,516
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.8% 11.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 4.3% 4.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 13.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst