Topic summary
69% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,052 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rehabilitation results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 1,551 hits . Analysis detected 11,296 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,652 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (10,947 of 16,562 topics). This Rehabilitation is better (less manipulative) than 66.10% of the peer group. Rehabilitation
Topic details
Total words: 11,652
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst