Fox News89%

Seniors taking multiple medications may face unexpected health effects65%

By Melissa Rudy0%

12/26/2025, 10:29:22 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 107 hits. Analysis detected 362 faulty-reasoning hits from 504 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 59.2% and a BS Rank of 65% (7,739 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 64.60% of the article peer group.

Older adults discharged from hospitals on multiple medications are less likely to regain independence during rehabilitation, a new study suggests. 
The Japanese study, published in the journal BMC Geriatrics Dec. 17, explored the effects of polypharmacy  defined as taking six or more regular medications on a regular basis  at a convalescent rehabilitation hospital in Japan. 
The retrospective observational study looked at 1,903 patients 65 and older who underwent rehabilitation at the hospital from April 2017 to March 2024, according to a press release. 
The patients had one of three conditions: cerebrovascular disease (a disorder of the brain’s blood vessels that reduce or block blood flow), motor disorder (a condition that affects movement and muscle control) or disuse syndrome (inactivity leading to muscle weakness and physical decline). 
Of the total group, 62.1% of the patients were taking six or more medications when they were discharged from the hospital, and more than 76% of them were 80 or older. 
Those taking multiple medications were also more likely to be taking benzodiazepine receptor agonists (taken for anxiety or insomnia), laxatives and psychotropic medications (mainly used for depression, anxiety, psychosis and other mood disorders). 
The researchers determined that those with polypharmacy who had cerebrovascular disease and disuse syndrome scored significantly lower in the functional independence measure (FIM), which assesses how independently a person can perform everyday activities, especially after illness, injury or hospitalization. 
Those in the motor disorder group didn’t show any link between polypharmacy and FIM. 
The negative effects were stronger among adults over 80 and those recovering from stroke-related conditions or general weakness due to inactivity. 
Based on these findings, the researchers suggest that reviewing and reducing unnecessary medications could help improve recovery for those undergoing rehabilitation. 
Dr. Marc Siegel, Fox News senior medical analyst, refers to polypharmacy with seniors as a 'risky proposition.' 
Even though each medication may have a purpose, often important, we must keep in mind that the ability to tolerate various medications and metabolize them efficiently diminishes as you get older," he told Fox News Digital. 
For example, a med that sedates you or even has the potential to disorient you may be more likely to do so as you become elderly. 
Drug interactions also tend to increase as patients grow older, Siegel added. 
This must all be monitored carefully by your physician, and, sometimes, less is more,' he said. 
The study did have some limitations, the researchers acknowledged. 
Due to its retrospective and observational design, it does not prove that the medications caused the outcome. 
The researchers also lacked data on specific doses of the medications and the intensity of the rehabilitation, they noted. 
Also, the study was conducted at just a single hospital, so the results may not apply to more general populations. 
Future research is needed to determine which specific medications most affect recovery and to explore the best approaches for reducing prescriptions. 
Melissa Rudy is senior health editor and a member of the lifestyle team at Fox News Digital. 
Story tips can be sent to melissa.rudy@fox.com. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.4%Melissa Rudy: 6.9%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias3.4%This article: 5.2%Melissa Rudy: 6.7%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 7.5%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.2%Melissa Rudy: 22.4%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 4.8%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 3.2%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.6%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Melissa Rudy: 3.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion3.2%This article: 18.1%Melissa Rudy: 16.2%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias18.1%This article: 8.3%Melissa Rudy: 16.9%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 4.7%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 5.1%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.9%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 3.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 8.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 3.9%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 5.2%Melissa Rudy: 10.4%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal5.2%This article: 21.2%Melissa Rudy: 34.2%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority21.2%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 6.2%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 2.7%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 4.6%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 6.5%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 4.2%Melissa Rudy: 3.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.2%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Melissa Rudy: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%

504 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.