Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 504 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Polypharmacy results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Anchoring Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 326 hits . Analysis detected 1,452 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,008 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.2% and a BS Rank of 87% (2,275 of 16,562 topics). This Polypharmacy is worse (more manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Polypharmacy
Topic details
Total words: 1,008
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.3% percentile 7.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 26.1% 26.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 32.3% 32.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 32.3%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 25.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Middle Ground: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst