Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,517 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melissa Rudy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 34.2% saturation with 1,038 hits . Analysis detected 5,656 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,034 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.2% and a BS Rank of 89% (787 of 6,628 authors). This Melissa Rudy is worse (more manipulative) than 88.10% of the peer group. Melissa Rudy
Author details
Total words: 3,034
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.1% percentile 6.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 34.2% 34.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 16.9% 16.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Author 8.3% 8.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 10.4% 10.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 22.4% 22.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 5.1% 5.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 16.3% 16.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Author 34.2%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Author 22.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 4.0% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 4.6% Bandwagon: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst