Topic summary
31% 11 analyzed articles/videos 9,486 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Regional Security results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 2,739 hits . Analysis detected 25,058 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,596 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (14,204 of 15,780 topics). This Regional Security is better (less manipulative) than 90.00% of the peer group. Regional Security
Topic details
Total words: 31,596
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score11 analyzed articles31.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst