Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos258 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Recruitment results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Halo Effect, and Anchoring Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 435 hits. Analysis detected 3,497 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,514 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (6,029 of 16,562 topics). This Recruitment is worse (more manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group.
Recruitment
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,514
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

64% percentile
025507510063.6% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.7%4.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 15.2%15.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 17.3%17.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 14.1%14.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 10.0%10.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos