Bank of America to hire nearly 4,000 summer interns and campus recruits ⁠69%

By Eric Revell⁠74%

6/3/2026, 5:49:38 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 725 faulty-reasoning hits from 435 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (6,862 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 68.70% of the article peer group.

Bank of America on Wednesday announced that it will be hiring nearly 4,000 summer interns and full-time recruits from campuses this summer as the nation's second-largest bank looks to bring new talent into its workforce. 
The firm said in a release that the hiring plans are reflective of Bank of America's deliberate and ongoing approach to recruiting high-performing talent from more than 500 colleges and universities to support the bank's clients and drive its long-term growth. 
"Our approach to hiring is intentional and long term," said Sheri Bronstein, chief people officer at Bank of America. 
"We focus on attracting the best talent with the right skills, potential, and a strong career mindset – and we invest in growing that talent through long-term careers that meet the needs of our clients and drive responsible growth," Bronstein added. 
BANK OF AMERICA'S LEGACY OF BUILDING THE AMERICAN DREAM 
Bank of America's announcement noted that the financial services provider remains committed to other previously-announced initiatives aimed at hiring entry-level workers. 
The bank's military veteran program has resulted in over 20,000 hires to date, the bank said. 
It added that it is also continuing to hire from community colleges around the country and its other early career programs to meet the evolving needs of the firm's global client base. 
WHY 529 PLANS REMAIN A POWERFUL TOOL FOR COLLEGE, TRADE SCHOOL SAVINGS 
Last fall, Bank of America said that it aims to hire another 10,000 more individuals with military backgrounds over the next five years – adding to the more than 20,000 hires dating back to 2015 and raising the new goal to 30,000 from that time. 
Its September 2025 announcement also said it planned to move forward with 8,000 new hires from community colleges over the next five years, doubling its annual hires from 800 to 1,600 in that period of time. 
BANK OF AMERICA TO AWARD $1B IN STOCK TO NEARLY ALL EMPLOYEES THROUGH SHARING SUCCESS PROGRAM 
Bank of America also said in September that it plans to invest in 700 jobs within its network of financial centers in new growth markets, including Alabama, Idaho, Louisiana and Wisconsin. 
The jobs would support the opening of 26 financial centers over the next 18 months and 37 financial centers in those states in 2027. 
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 
The company also announced Wednesday it has donated $2 million to purchase FIFA World Cup tickets for members of the U.S. military, veterans, first responders and their families to see games across the tournament for free. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 2.6%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Eric Revell: 4.7%FoxBusiness: 3.4%Anchoring Bias8.3%This article: 22.1%Eric Revell: 3.6%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic22.1%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 3.0%FoxBusiness: 3.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 25.3%Eric Revell: 11.0%FoxBusiness: 12.9%Framing Effect25.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.8%Eric Revell: 1.4%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.1%Eric Revell: 9.5%FoxBusiness: 8.8%Optimism Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.7%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 6.9%FoxBusiness: 7.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 9.4%Eric Revell: 2.5%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.5%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.6%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 27.4%Eric Revell: 3.1%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Halo Effect27.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 10.3%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias10.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.4%Eric Revell: 6.7%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority4.4%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.2%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.4%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.3%Eric Revell: 3.4%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion8.3%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.8%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 5.5%Eric Revell: 3.9%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.5%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 1.0%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 2.1%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.2%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.1%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.4%Eric Revell: 1.3%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote9.4%This article: 4.4%Eric Revell: 0.9%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection4.4%This article: 11.5%Eric Revell: 3.2%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice11.5%This article: 2.8%Eric Revell: 1.9%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination2.8%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Eric Revell: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.7%Eric Revell: 2.8%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.7%

435 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers73%attributed speech118writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageBank of America • 35 words • 0.0% coverageBank of America • 41 words • 100.0% coverageSheri Bronstein • 19 words • 100.0% coverageSheri Bronstein • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageBank of America • 21 words • 0.0% coverageBank of America • 16 words • 0.0% coverageBank of America • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageBank of America • 45 words • 0.0% coverageBank of America • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageBank of America • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sheri Bronstein

100%flagged-word coverage
60 attributed words19% of attributed speech90% writer coverage
0%35.0%70.0%Unattributed Quote+68.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sheri Bronstein: 68.3%68.3%Quote-first Misdirection+31.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Sheri Bronstein: 31.7%31.7%Attempt to Sell a Product -21.2 ptsWriter: 21.2%Sheri Bronstein: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-10.2 ptsWriter: 10.2%Sheri Bronstein: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-7.6 ptsWriter: 7.6%Sheri Bronstein: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.