Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Hiring results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 523 hits. Analysis detected 5,124 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,362 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Hiring is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Hiring
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,362
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.6%2.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 12.0%12.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.8%7.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.9%11.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.5%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos