Topic summary
⁠67%5 analyzed articles/videos304 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rare Diseases results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 436 hits. Analysis detected 3,713 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,460 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (6,131 of 16,562 topics). This Rare Diseases is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Rare Diseases
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,460
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.0%4.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.6%12.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 10.9%10.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos