Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,518 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ransom Demand results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 1,250 hits. Analysis detected 5,857 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,741 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,127 of 16,562 topics). This Ransom Demand is worse (more manipulative) than 75.10% of the peer group.
Ransom Demand
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,741
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

75% percentile
025507510075.1% percentile
4.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 28.9%28.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 33.4%33.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 15.5%15.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 33.4%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 28.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Bandwagon: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos