Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,492 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Psychedelic Therapy results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 1,925 hits. Analysis detected 11,863 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,968 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠23% (12,627 of 16,244 topics). This Psychedelic Therapy is better (less manipulative) than 77.70% of the peer group.
Psychedelic Therapy
Topic details
Total words: 13,968
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles14K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.1%6.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 13.8%13.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos