Author summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 4,751 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pamela McCall results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 1,503 hits . Analysis detected 16,285 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,660 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,348 of 6,244 authors). This Pamela McCall is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group. Pamela McCall
Author details
Total words: 22,660
Article count: 7
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst