Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,366 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jennifer Warren results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 615 hits . Analysis detected 4,785 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,464 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 50% (3,353 of 6,628 authors). This Jennifer Warren is better (less manipulative) than 50.60% of the peer group. Jennifer Warren
Author details
Total words: 5,464
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 49.4% percentile 2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.0% 10.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.0% 3.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Special Pleading: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst