Topic summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Price Increases results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 698 hits. Analysis detected 4,320 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,103 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (5,997 of 15,578 topics). This Price Increases is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Price Increases
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,103
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.5% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 17.0%17.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.6%3.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 9.4%9.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.7%6.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 17.0%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 2.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos