Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Rubino results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 598 hits. Analysis detected 3,997 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (1,019 of 6,347 authors). This Daniel Rubino is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
Daniel Rubino
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠84%Daniel Rubino (selected)6%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,636
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

84% percentile
025507510084.0% percentile
5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 22.7%22.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.2%7.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 0.9%0.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.5%5.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 9.3%9.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.4%13.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 22.7%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Author 14.6%, sitewide 2.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 9.3%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Author 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos