Topic summary
⁠76%4 analyzed articles/videos1,269 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Primaries results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 505 hits. Analysis detected 5,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,219 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (9,500 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Primaries is better (less manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Presidential Primaries

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score4 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos