Topic summary
76% 12 analyzed articles/videos 9,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Politics results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 6,454 hits . Analysis detected 48,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 36,149 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (9,619 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Politics is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group. Presidential Politics
Topic details
Total words: 36,149
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.9% percentile 2.6% BS Score12 analyzed articles36.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.0% 9.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.9% 17.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 15.7% 15.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
WAMU 15% 7/13/2026, 12:37:52 PM