Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Initiatives results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 612 hits. Analysis detected 5,092 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,468 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (7,070 of 16,562 topics). This Presidential Initiatives is worse (more manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group.
Presidential Initiatives
Topic details
Total words: 4,468
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510057.3% percentile
3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.7%13.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.3%7.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos