Topic summary
46% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,607 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Presidential Elections results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 2,199 hits . Analysis detected 17,278 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,227 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (12,985 of 15,765 topics). This Presidential Elections is better (less manipulative) than 82.40% of the peer group. Presidential Elections
Topic details
Total words: 19,227
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.6% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 11.4% 11.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst