Topic summary
33% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,534 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Poverty results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 2,718 hits . Analysis detected 23,217 faulty-reasoning hits from 30,743 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 11% (13,522 of 15,142 topics). This Poverty is better (less manipulative) than 89.30% of the peer group. Poverty
Topic details
Total words: 30,743
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.7% percentile 1.6% BS Score7 analyzed articles30.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst