Topic summary
63%7 analyzed articles/videos10,354 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Speeches results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 4,152 hits. Analysis detected 38,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 37,407 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (11,981 of 15,690 topics). This Political Speeches is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
Political Speeches

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

24% percentile
025507510023.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score7 analyzed articles37.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.1%10.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.6%3.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate