Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,404 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zohran Mamdani results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 1,434 hits. Analysis detected 15,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,616 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 51% (3,299 of 6,628 authors). This Zohran Mamdani is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Zohran Mamdani
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
51%Zohran Mamdani (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 13,616
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.1%7.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.7%6.7%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 5.8%5.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 10.4%10.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 9.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Author 5.8%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos