Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabriel Zucman results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Framing Effect , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 2,181 hits . Analysis detected 14,421 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,372 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 77% (1,539 of 6,628 authors). This Gabriel Zucman is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Gabriel Zucman
Author details
Total words: 8,372
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.8% percentile 4.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 26.1% 26.1% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 17.5% 17.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 11.5% 11.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.3% 10.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.2% 10.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Author 6.2% 6.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 26.1%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 17.5%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Author 11.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 6.2%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst