Topic summary
99% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,015 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Reform results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Out-Group Homogeneity Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.9% saturation with 1,173 hits . Analysis detected 9,759 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,354 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (2,472 of 16,562 topics). This Political Reform is worse (more manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. Political Reform
Topic details
Total words: 4,354
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.1% percentile 6.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 15.6% 15.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 26.9% 26.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Topic 10.4% 10.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.0% 14.0% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 26.1% 26.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 26.9%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Topic 15.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 26.1%, sitewide 19.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Horn Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 1.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 0.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Middle Ground: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst