Topic summary
74%5 analyzed articles/videos2,306 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Funding results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.7% saturation with 2,575 hits. Analysis detected 17,844 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,427 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 64% (6,096 of 16,562 topics). This Political Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Political Funding
Topic details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.2% percentile
3.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 24.7%24.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 14.8%14.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 23.1%23.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 24.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 1.4%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate