Author summary
66% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,160 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyla Guilfoil results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 531 hits . Analysis detected 3,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,480 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (2,866 of 6,628 authors). This Kyla Guilfoil is worse (more manipulative) than 56.80% of the peer group. Kyla Guilfoil
Author details
Total words: 3,480
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.8% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 15.3% 15.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 5.2% 5.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 15.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 5.2%, sitewide 0.8% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst