Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos340 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Endorsement results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 492 hits. Analysis detected 3,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,864 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (6,408 of 16,562 topics). This Political Endorsement is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Political Endorsement
Topic details
Total words: 2,864
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

61% percentile
025507510061.3% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.2%10.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Bandwagon: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos