Topic summary
66%7 analyzed articles/videos2,599 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Police Investigation results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.9% saturation with 2,528 hits. Analysis detected 10,247 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,050 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 52% (7,971 of 16,562 topics). This Police Investigation is worse (more manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Police Investigation

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510051.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.4%7.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Red Herring: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.7%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate