Topic summary
0%7 analyzed articles/videos3,316 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Police And Law Enforcement results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.7% saturation with 2,808 hits. Analysis detected 15,618 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,361 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 48% (8,078 of 15,344 topics). This Police And Law Enforcement is better (less manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Police And Law Enforcement

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.4% percentile
2.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.2%12.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 22.7%22.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Horn Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate