Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,207 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Polar Vortex results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 1,791 hits. Analysis detected 7,715 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,788 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (2,197 of 15,722 topics). This Polar Vortex is worse (more manipulative) than 86.00% of the peer group.
Polar Vortex
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,788
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

86% percentile
025507510086.0% percentile
7.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 16.5%16.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 37.4%37.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.7%8.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 12.4%12.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.2%7.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 37.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 16.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos