Topic summary
67% 16 analyzed articles/videos 7,339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Podcast results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 4,832 hits . Analysis detected 35,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,744 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (14,107 of 15,352 topics). This Podcast is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group. Podcast
Topic details
Total words: 45,744
Article count: 16
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 8.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score16 analyzed articles45.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst