Topic summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Player Contracts results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 694 hits. Analysis detected 7,849 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,399 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,220 of 16,494 topics). This Player Contracts is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Player Contracts
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,399
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.1%8.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.8%10.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.6%6.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos