Author summary
100%1 analyzed article/video802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sean Keeler results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Anchoring Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 513 hits. Analysis detected 5,163 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,406 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (852 of 6,359 authors). This Sean Keeler is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group.
Sean Keeler
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
87%Sean Keeler (selected)6%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,406
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

87% percentile
025507510086.6% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.4%10.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 21.3%21.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 15.8%15.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 14.5%14.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.8%12.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 13.1%13.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 7.4%7.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.3%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.6%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Author 15.8%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 13.1%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos