Author summary
100% 1 analyzed article/video 802 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Troy Renck results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , False Dilemma , and Anchoring Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 513 hits . Analysis detected 5,163 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,406 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (851 of 6,402 authors). This Troy Renck is worse (more manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group. Troy Renck
Author details
Total words: 2,406
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.7% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.4% 10.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 21.3% 21.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 15.8% 15.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 14.5% 14.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.8% 12.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 13.1% 13.1% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Author 7.4% 7.4% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Author 6.6% 6.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 21.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 16.6%, sitewide 15.9% False Dilemma: Author 15.8%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 14.5%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.3%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Loss Aversion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 2.5% Recency Bias: Author 7.3%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.6%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst