Topic summary
⁠34%4 analyzed articles/videos1,806 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Philadelphia Phillies results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 1,156 hits. Analysis detected 8,711 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,264 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (10,840 of 15,333 topics). This Philadelphia Phillies is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Philadelphia Phillies
Topic details
Total words: 9,264
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

29% percentile
025507510029.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.5%12.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos